Eunuchs and Ghilman in The Islamic Empire.

One of the first things we learn of when we study history books, is the British Empire and the heinous atrocities committed in the course of the British Empire colonising far away lands, people and cultures. We learn about the Aboriginal people of Canada, Australia and America who were brutally forced to give up their cultures, religions, languages, names, vast resources and indigenous identities, to the European bloc of invaders who established a strange foreign rule that terrorised the Natives beyond bounds. We learn about the Atlantic slave trade and the grave crimes committed against the subjugated black African people. But we hardly ever learn about the heinous crimes perpetuated by the Islamic Empire. We hardly ever learn about the Islamic slave trade, which was extensively more atrocious than the Atlantic slave trade in that it was more profitable, affected a wider demography of indigenous peoples, and went on longer! What’s more, slavery in Islam exists till this very day, and is afforded legitimacy by the unchanging divine Islamic text. 

One of the reasons why slave trade is considered an extremely contemptible practice in the modern world is – asides from the obvious dehumanisation of social status it immediately relegates its victims to, and the curbing of natural human rights – it ushers in contemptible social ills such as sex trafficking and male castration on a grand commercial scale! The unprecedented pan-continental economic success of raiding infidel communities and enslaving war captives was exclusive to Islamic culture, under the Islamic Empire. Naturally, it gave way to the demand for Eunuchs. Eunuchs were the preferred male slave choice for consumers, because they posed lesser security risks at the harems, in the palace and in the domestic affairs of ordinary Muslims.

Eunuchs were plentiful in the Islamic Empire. Muslim rulers, who ruled under the authority of Caliphs, purchased and had slaves from Persia, the Indian subcontinent, Europe, Africa and beyond, in vast quantities in their palaces. Ordinary Muslims outside the royal class also had male slaves who were castrated specially for their service.

Many Islamic commentators, politicians, scholars and ordinary Muslims often argue that Eunuchs predate Islam and that the castration of slaves goes against Islamic doctrine itself, as Islam prohibits body mutilation. It is true that castration of slaves is not an Islamic teaching and that rather than engage in the castrations themselves, Muslim merchants had other people to do it for them (discussed further below). It is also true that Greeks for example, as well as other people outside of Arabia were castrating slaves unjustly before the advent of Islam. Islam however does not view slavery or slave trade through an abominable lens, as other legislature adopted by other cultures have come to. Muslims are encouraged to treat their slaves fairly and to go as far as manumitting them on certain occasions, but they are not once commanded to do so. There is also the instance of a Muslim being instructed to free a slave as punishment for (a Muslim’s) involuntary manslaughter of another Muslim (not the Kafir or slave), but for the most part Manumission in Islam is something a Muslim should do only if he feels in his heart to do it. It is an indisputable fact that there is no compulsion from Allah to manumit slaves. Muhammad himself freed some slaves, while enslaving others simultaneously. It would be needless perhaps, to draw attention to this debacle were it not for reoccurring reports of slavery still being widely practised today in the Islamic world (Mauritania, Sudan, Saudi Arabia). There are also calls from everyday Muslims, to re-establish Khilafa – a global empire based on the very Islamic jurisprudence that institutionalises slavery and other ills associated with it such as sex trafficking and male castration.

The British Empire, in spite of its atrocities, had a conscience. It allowed room for a vigorous abolitionist movement started by William Wilberforce in 1787, whose ideas of granting equal constitutional rights to slaves, took flight all over the Empire. Many English people at the time viewed slavery with contempt and wanted the practice to be abolished completely. They wanted the establishment to utilise its influence to promote this egalitarian ideal throughout the Empire and in the Americas, to ensure that those found transgressing were severely punished. It took a few decades but eventually the policy was implemented and all slaves were by law released from their owners. In stark contrast, there is no  abolitionist movement in Islam. There is no Islamic scholar, leader or politician publicly advocating a defiance of the Prophetic Traditions (Muhammad’s life and his examples) of: enslaving war captives, selling them off for profit, and reducing them to sex slaves. This institution which gives way to the ensuing ill of castrating slaves for the purpose of service to Muslims – Muslim comfort and security – is not actively condemned by Muslims. Attempting to abolish this kind of thinking in Islam meets fierce resistance from fundamentalist Muslims, as it is in stark contrast to the thinking certified by Islamic doctrine and the Prophetic Traditions. Heretic Muslims who find themselves stuck in a clash of civilisations and try to promote abolitionism in Islam do not do so without being considered apostates or infidels by the larger Muslim community under the herd of fundamentalists. This practice of castrating male captives, which was prominent in the Islamic Empire until the neutralisation of Ottoman rule (by the West), is discussed in M. A. Khan’s book: Islamic Jihad: A Legacy of Imperialism, Forced Conversion and Slavery. In the excerpt below titled Eunuchs and Ghilman taken from chapter VII, M. A. Khan attributes prevalent male castration to Muslim demand, which was in turn fuelled by three primary factors in the Islamic Empire.

With no Islamic abolitionist movement in tow, the industrial institution of slavery exist today in 2013, in the Islamic republic of Mauritania, Sudan and various parts of the Muslim world. In truth, the subject of slavery in Islam is an exiguously studied subject.

©2013. Secular African Society. All Rights Reserved.

EUNUCHS AND GHILMAN

Another extremely cruel, dehumanizing and degrading aspect of Islamic slavery was the large-scale castration of male captives. It has received little attention of critics and historians. Historically, castration did receive little opposition in the Muslim world well into the modern age. But Muslims normally engaged Jews or other non-Muslims to perform the operation on the argument that mutilation of human bodies was prohibited in Islam. (This is hypocritical in the least, since beheading of totally innocent people in large numbers has been a common practice right from the days of the Prophet, while amputation of hands and legs are divine Islamic punishment for certain crimes.) Yet, the employment of eunuchs is clearly sanctioned by Allah, as the Quran instructs Muslim women to cover their body and ornaments with cloaks except ‘to their husbands or their fathers, or the fathers of their husbands, or their sons, or the sons of their husbands, or their brothers, or their brothers’ sons, or their sisters’ sons, or their women, or those whom their right hands possess, or the male servants not having need (of women)…’ [Quran 24:31]. Prophet Muhammad had himself accepted a eunuch as gift, says a hadith, which has been excluded from canonical collections.845

Image

Two African eunuchs and six concubines of an Ottoman sultan, as recently as 1929

Castrated males, normally young handsome boys, were in great demands amongst Muslim rulers and elites mainly for three reasons. First, Muslim harems and households used to have a few to thousands of wives and concubines. Naturally, most of these women were left sexually unsatisfied as well as jealous and indignant about sharing their husbands and masters with so many women. Keeping male slaves in such palaces and households was a cause of concern for the husband and master, because those sexually unsatisfied and often indignant women could be tempted into sexual contact with the male-slaves. Attraction of harem women to other men was rather common. For example, when Pellow, not a eunuch, was surprisingly placed as a harem-guard by Moulay Ismail upon a request from one of his favourite wives, his wives showed amorous interest in him. Aware of the consequence of such a tango if the sultan found out, ‘‘I thought it highly prudent to keep a very strict guard upon all my actions,’’ wrote Pellow.846

It was, therefore, safer for masters—particularly the rulers and high officials, who kept large harem—to keep eunuchs, instead of virile men, in their households and palaces. It is no wonder that the term harem originated from haram, meaning prohibited—more specifically, “out of bounds” (to unrelated men).

According to John Laffin, black slaves were generally castrated ‘based on the assumption that the blacks had an ungovernable sexual appetite.847 From India to Africa, eunuchs were specifically engaged in guarding the royal harems. They kept tab on the passage of men and women in and out of the seraglio and spied for the ruler on the harem women about their behaviour, infidelity in particular. Eunuchs were needed in their thousands to look after huge harems, probably the largest royal department in medieval Islamic kingdoms.

ImageThe Kızlar Ağası, head of the black eunuchs of the Ottoman Imperial Harem. The title literally means “Chief of the Girls”.

Secondly, the castrated men, with no hope of a family or offspring to look forward to in their old age, were likely to show greater fidelity and devotion to the master in order to earn their favor and support when they grew old. The castrated slaves, devoid of sexual distractions, could also devote themselves exclusively to work relatively easily in the usually sexually-charged Islamic culture.

The third reason for the high demand for eunuchs was homosexual infatuation of many Muslim rulers, generals and nobles. Eunuchs, kept for carnal indulgence, also called ghilman, used to be handsome young boys. They used to wear ‘rich and attractive uniforms and often beautified and perfumed their bodies in effeminate fashion.’ The concept of ghilman comes from the following verses of the Quran, which describes heavenly male attendants (ghilman) in paradise:

  • ‘Round about them will serve, (devoted) to them, young male servants (handsome) as Pearls well-guarded.’ [Quran 52:24]
  • ‘There wait on them immortal youths, with bowls and ewers and a cup from a pure spring.’ [Quran 56:17–18]

Anwar Shaikh in his essay Islamic Morality describes ghilman as follows: ‘Paradise is the description of the luxurious surroundings dwelt in by Houris and Ghilman. Houris are the most beautiful ever-young virgins with wide, flexing eyes and swelling bosoms. Ghilman are the immortal young boys, pretty like pearls, clothed in green silk and brocade and embellished with bracelets of silver.’848 The concept of ghilman in Islam may have been prompted by the dominant culture of sodomy that existed amongst Arabs during Muhammad’s time as discussed already (see p. 131–32). Sodomy was also prevalent in Persia. According to Hitti, ‘We read of ghilman in the reign of al-Rashid; but it was evidently the Caliph al-Amin, who, following Persian precedent, established in the Arab world the ghilman institution for the practice of sexual relations. A judge of whom there is record used four hundred such youths. Poets did not disdain to give public expression to their perverted passions and to address amorous pieces of their compositions to beardless young boys.849

Castration was not performed on the black captives alone, but on captives of all shades and races: be it the blacks of Africa, the browns of India, the yellows of Central Asia or the whites of Europe. In the Middle Ages, notes Segal, Prague and Verdun became castration centers for white eunuchs, while Kharazon near the Caspian Sea for Central Asian eunuchs. Islamic Spain was another center for producing white eunuchs. At the beginning of the tenth century, Caliph al-Muqtadir (r. 908–937) had assembled in the Baghdad palace some 11,000 eunuchs: 7,000 Blacks and 4,000 Whites (Greek).850

Image

Black Eunuch of the Ottoman Sultan. Photograph Pascal Sebah 1870s.

It is noted already that there was widespread castration of slaves in Bengal during Mughal Emperor Jahangir, which had become a widespread practice across India. It appears that since Bakhtiyar Khilji’s conquest of Bengal in 1205, it had become a leading source of enslavement and castration for supplying eunuchs. On his way back to Venice from Kublai Khan’s Court, Marco Polo visited India in the late thirteenth century; he found Bengal as a major source of eunuchs. Duarte Barbosa in the late sultanate period (1206– 1526) and Francois Pyrard in the Mughal period (1526–1799) also found Bengal as the leading supplier of castrated slaves. Ain-i-Akbari (compiled 1590s) also affirms the same.851 Some 22,000 individuals were emasculated in 1659 in Golkunda during Aurangzeb. Said Khan Chaghtai of Jahangir’s reign owned 1,200 eunuchs. Even kind-hearted Akbar employed eunuchs in large numbers. According to Ain-i-Akbari, Akbar’s harem ‘contained 5,000 ladies, each of whom had separate apartments… watched in successive circles by female guards, eunuchs, Rajputs and the porters at the gates…’852

Sultan Alauddin Khilji had engaged 50,000 young boys in his personal services, while Muhammad Tughlaq had 20,000 and Firoz Tughlaq 40,000. Many, if not most, of these slave-boys were likely castrated. Even Malik Kafur, Alauddin’s famous commander, was a eunuch. Khusrau Khan, Sultan Kutbuddin Mubarak Khilji’s favorite commander, who killed the sultan in 1320 and occupied the throne briefly, was a eunuch too. Medieval Muslim historians—namely Muhammad Ferishtah, Khondamir, Minhaj Siraj and Ziauddin Barani et al., have recorded stories of infatuation of other illustrious sultans, namely Mahmud Ghazni, Qutbuddin Aibak and Sikandar Lodi—for handsome young boys. Sikandar Lodi had once boasted, ‘If I order one of my slaves to be seated in a palanquin,853 the entire body of nobility would carry him on their shoulders at my bidding.’854 Sultan Mahmud had infatuation toward charming Tilak the Hindu, his favorite commander.855

Castration of male captives was performed on an unprecedented scale in order to meet the demand of eunuchs in the Muslim world. It was Muslims, who inaugurated the practice of castrating male slaves on a grand scale. Most of the male slaves of the Muslim world—particularly, those captured in Africa—were castrated. While eleven million African slaves were transported to the New World (West Indies and Americas) during the 350-year trans-Atlantic slave-trade, a larger number of them ended up in the Middle East, North Africa, Central Asia, India, Islamic Spain and Ottoman Europe during the thirteen centuries of Islamic domination. However, if compared the Diaspora left by black slaves in the New World with that in the Islamic world, it becomes evident that the overwhelming majority of the black slaves of the Islamic world were castrated; therefore, they failed to leave a notable Diaspora behind.

Image

Chief Eunuch of Ottoman Sultan Abdul Hamid II at the Imperial Palace, 1912.

The fate of the millions of European, Indian, Central Asian and Middle Eastern infidels—reduced to wearing the shackles of Islamic slavery—might not have been much different. Marco Polo (1280s) and Duarte Barbosa (1500s) witnessed large-scale castrations in India; the same was occurring in the reign of Abkar (d. 1605), Jahangir (d. 1628) and Aurangzeb (d. 1707). Castration, therefore, was a common practice in India throughout the Muslim rule. It might have contributed to some extent to the decrease in India’s population from about 200 million in 1000 CE to 170 million in 1500 CE.

For the complete references to the above excerpt, please refer to M. A. Khan’s book: Islamic Jihad: A Legacy of Imperialism, Forced Conversion and Slavery. A free copy is available online.

REFERENCES

843. Milton, p. 120
844. Naipaul (1998), p. 332

845. Pellat Ch, Lambton AKS and Orhonlu C (1978) Khasi, In The Encyclopaedia of Islam, E J Brill ed., Leiden, Vol. IV, p. 1089

846. Milton, p. 126

847. Segal, p. 52
848. Shaikh A, Islamic Morality, http://iranpoliticsclub.net/islam/islamicmorality/index.htm
849. Hitti PK (1948) The Arabs : A Short History, Macmillan, London, p. 99
850. Segal, p. 40–41; Hitti (1961), p. 276

851. Moreland, p. 93, note 1

852. Ibid, p. 87–88
853. Palanquins were used for carrying the women, especially the newly married brides, in medieval India.

854. Lal (1994), p. 106–09
855. Elliot & Dawson, Vol. II, p. 127–29

©2013. Secular African Society. All Rights Reserved.

Advertisements

16 thoughts on “Eunuchs and Ghilman in The Islamic Empire.

  1. Stop spreading lies about Islam. Slaves are treated well in islam. Islam never allowed mutilation of slaves and it still doesn’t. In Islam slaves have rights. Stop with your lies.

  2. Pingback: Great news: “Muslims are encouraged to treat their slaves fairly” — Winds Of Jihad By SheikYerMami

  3. Actually, homosexuality is allowed in Islam. As long as the target is young boys and eunuch though.

    • And which sick person did you hear that from? Homosexuality was condemned in every form and Muslim men are not allowed to even LOOK upon a handsome youth if he fears temptation. No sex with eunuchs either. The only people men can have sex with are their wives, and their FEMALE captive staves State your source, and I hope it isn’t some misguided person.

      • NIXIM before I humbly enlist you with your knowledge and devotion to Islam to assist me with my understanding of Islam I’d like to express my feelings about Islam.When I see a Muslim with great humility in my heart I say to God, “there but for the grace of God go I” by the grace of God I was not born into a culture where I would have been conditioned from childhood to accept Islam as my faith.
        As far as you being a Muslim or anyone else I have no objection to nor would I entertain the thought of trying to persuade them to any other religious endeavor. All I have to say to Muslims is BETTER YOU THAN ME!!
        Now please don’t get offended that I was so candid for I meant nothing that was spawned from hatred in my heart.

        Now please explain to me why I and many others have seen mutilations documented on film by Muslims with their act being justified by the Qur’an as the penalty for stealing.Last week I watched a video of a 9 yr. old skinny little boy who being hungry stole a slice of bread. The penalty for this was carried out by eager grown men who wrapped his little arm in what looked like a blanket and had a car roll over his arm.
        Here lately I’ve heard what is a very small minority of Muslims, as you, tell us things that we learned that were contrary to the brutal savagery we have witnessed thru media sources. Since this is contrary to your tenets of faith and since Islamic sects have been killing one another from the day Muhammad died. Is this because the doctrines of each sect are so drastically different interpretations?
        Sexual intercourse is a carnal desire of the flesh, Do you agree with this? The Qur’an promises the righteous Muslim male the expectation of sexual intercourse in the afterlife. Since this bares evidence in the Qur’an does this mean that Islam is a religion of the flesh or the spirit?
        Finally, the Bible was accepted as a holy book long before the Prophet Muhammad or Mormon Prophet Joseph Smith were born and longer before the Qur’an was established or the book of Mormon. Both Prophets refer to the Bible as a holy book with Islam calling Jew and Christian “people of the book”. In the NT of the Book there are 2 verses that are in the nature of a warning for Christians to beware of. 2nd Corinthians 11:14 warns that Satan can also transform into an angel of light and Galatians 1:8,9 which says that if any man or angel come to you with a gospel different from that preached by the apostles let them be cursed.
        Please offer your input on this:: both Prophets claim that it were angels that bought to them God’s truth, Muhammad said his was the angel Gabriel and Smith said his angel told him that his name was Moroni. Since these 2 religions disagree with one another this means that only one can have the truth for since they are in disagreement both can’t be God’s truth, therefore, which angel bought the truth? Or does the 2 verses that foretold of angels long before the reality of their fact, carry the weight of credibility and cancels both religions out for only God can foretell the future? Or could this be the most ironic coincidence in the world?
        NIXIM you could “clear the smoke out of the room” with a proper answer.
        THANK YOU for your time

        ‘”

      • To Mister Dan Flore:

        I understand, and I greatly appreciate your friendliness and candour. It is a rareness when speaking to others about religion, on the internet, something I usually avoid.

        There are many Muslims who misinterpret their religion and their book, everyone can agree. (The same with every religion, following ect.) Some people will justify their crimes or beliefs by books, or people but that doesn’t mean that’s what it’s about. What you are describing, about the young boy is heartbreaking, but not something our religion allows or condones. What you are referring to is probably the Shariah law that says thieves are to have their hand cut off, which is something in Islam. However, there are a long list of things that have to be established. The boy should not have been hurt because 1, a child under the age of maturity can’t be held accountable, 2, he had a valuable reason to steal, because he was starving and had no choice, and 3. No random person can just carry out any Shariah punishment. The item stolen must have a significant value, and be proved to be stolen. Then it would be carried out by officials, in a place where Shariah law is established. Someone can’t just chop the hand off of someone who robbed his pastry shop from America. Nothing like that is allowed, and for people to do it, thinking they are following religion is a tragedy, but something we see too often.

        I wouldn’t say a ‘small’ minority of people think like this. There are over 1.6 billion Muslims in the world, and for only a minority to admit that these ways are wrong wouldn’t make much sense because there would probably be a lot more madness and terrorists like isis the world. Imagine a majority of those people were the terrorists you see in media…

        And there are sects who fight each other. For example, there are two large groups called Sunni and Shia Muslims, and those two groups are mainly split because the Shia do not agree with the leaders after the Prophet Muhammad. They say that the Prophet’s nephew should have led, even when The Prophet himself wanted someone else to lead.There are more differences, minor, some more major, but that is the main one that led to many fights.

        And yes, I agree that’s what sexual desire is. In Paradise, people will be able to experience pleasure, and only the good of emotions, and in Hell, the opposite. Muslims are not guaranteed Paradise, because if they sin, they must pay for their sins as well. And I don’t exactly understand your question. By spirit to you mean souls?

        Yes, according to Islam, The Christians and the Jews are people of the book. To be honest, I’ve never heard of angel Moroni, the only angel I know inside of Christianity is Gabriel, who, yes, is also known to Muslims. I know little about Mormons and their beliefs. In Islam, The reason the Prophet Muhammad came with another book after was because after years and years, both the bible, the Torah, and all other books before them were changed over and over (as with all of the different versions with different information) because the people changed what they wanted. Because of this, people were no longer practising it according to the original way it was. So Muhammad came with a new book; the final book. I know that the time when he came, the Jews were looking out for signs of the new Prophet, which were in their book. However, when Muhammad came to them, they rejected him, because he was not of their people, and instead from an Arab tribe.

        So, anyway, I hope this really long answer answered at least ONE of your questions. Just know that you cannot trust the media completely.

  4. A lot of banks provide plastic cards at low interest rate rate, these banks are known as
    one of the best charge card sellers. 30 if your vehicle multimeter begins in the drop (a drop is where where you are selected) This Ftc web site additionally presents more detailed information regarding restoring your own credit report.

  5. To the Ottoman’s credit, free negroes served in the irregular Bashi Bozouk regiments and their communities had the right to their own millets in North Africa.

    After the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire, some negroes settled in Georgia (Adzyubzha) and Albania (Ulcinj) but neither community survived the 20th century. Similar extant communities exist in Libya and Egypt though.

    The Mamluks used Sub-Saharan slave warriors in the Egyptian Campaign fought by Napoleon’s Armée d’Orient.

    The Arabian slave trade was ended by the British Empire and its prohibition was enforced by the Royal Navy. Coloured photographs of Arabian slave markets from Omani Zanzabar, some taken as late as in the 1960s, exist.

    Most famously, as you probably know, the US standing navy was expanded to end the slavery of European and American nationals by Barbary pirates (then Ottoman satraps and privateers). For how much people like to reject colonialism as a humanitarian and civilising force, the Barbary trade didn’t end until the French conquest of Algeria in 1830 (France abolished slavery in 1794).

    Well researched. I liked this.

  6. It was my understanding that no only were the Black/eunuch slaves castrated but also their penis was cut off, sewed up with only a small left for urinating. By the time the euncuhs reached the slave markets in North Africa, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia 90% of them had died due to medical reasons.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s